To
me, it’s ironic that the world of strategic
sales training has stayed pretty much the same over
the last fifteen years, but for most companies, the
selling environment has changed dramatically. Consequently,
salespeople are having to work harder to penetrate
new accounts, while prospective customers are working
even harder to keep salespeople at bay.
Don’t blame the customer. In
the past decade, downsizing and acquisitions have
burdened corporate decision-makers with greater responsibility,
oftentimes without the benefit of additional resources.
Meanwhile, workloads continue to increase, competitors
are getting hungrier, and the overall pace of business
has quickened. Even if they wanted to, customers simply
cannot afford to spend time with every salesperson
that comes calling.
Customers are also less accessible.
In the past, salespeople could build relationships
with the gatekeeper in their target accounts, knowing
that these relationships would eventually get them
in to see the decision-maker. Electronic devices have
since replaced most gatekeepers and you can’t
build a relationship with a voice mail system. Other
technological innovations such as e-mail, fax, cellular
phones, digital pagers, and the Internet have also
given customers the freedom to execute their job functions
away from their desks. While this is good in one sense,
it also means that potential customers are less likely
to pick up the telephone when you call.
Many prospects are reluctant to pick
up the telephone anyway. With the rapid economic expansion
in recent years, more vendor businesses are offering
more solutions than ever before. Consequently, decision-makers
are being inundated with a barrage of sales callers—who
are all competing for the same thing—a chunk
of the prospect’s budget, but even more importantly,
a slice of their time and attention.
Some sales organizations try to address
this problem by encouraging their salespeople to be
more aggressive. “If the going gets tough,”
chants the proverbial sales manager, “then we,
as salespeople, need to be even tougher.” The
problem is, if the telephone rings tonight at my house
during dinner, and a salesperson on the other end
tries to be “more aggressive” with me,
they will irreparably harm any chance they had of
making a sale. People don’t want to be pushed.
Many of the marquis sales training
courses currently being offered were developed fifteen
to twenty years ago, if not earlier. But the business
world has changed dramatically in the last twenty
years…and in my opinion, many of the “old
school” techniques no longer apply.
Most prospects already know the tricks—things
like calling after hours to avoid the gatekeeper,
or leaving voice-mail messages that say so-and-so
told me to call. They also know about the Ben Franklin
Close, Alternate Choice, and Feel-Felt-Found. That’s
why so many salespeople and sales managers have become
frustrated with traditional methods. Teaching salespeople
to be just like everyone else puts them at a competitive
disadvantage. When a salesperson is perceived “the
same” as everyone else, then they are only average,
by definition, and their chances of winning are significantly
diminished. Prospects and customers usually don’t
buy “average” products from an “average”
salesperson.
The fundamentals in selling have remained
the same. Salespeople must uncover needs before they
can provide solutions, the product or service being
offered must be cost justifiable, and the salesperson
with the best relationship has the greatest chance
of winning the business. People still do buy from
people. But the paradigms of the strategic sale have
shifted significantly and differentiation is now the
key.
Everyone wants to have good relationships
with lucrative prospects, in order to uncover needs,
present solutions, and secure a commitment. Establishing
mutual relationships with new prospects has grown
increasingly more difficult, however, and just because
a salesperson wants to ask questions, doesn’t
mean their prospects and customers will want to respond.
What
makes prospects and customers “want to”
respond? The answer is: Conversational Layering™.
The first time I tried to diagram the sales process,
I sketched a cacophony of boxes and arrows into a
messy schematic that would make most engineers proud.
This model evolved into a much simpler diagram (as
shown) that depicts the strategic sales process as
a series of prerequisite steps. Before you can secure
a commitment, for example, you must first present
a solution. Likewise, before you present solutions,
you must first uncover needs.
Relationships are an integral part
of the Conversational Layering model, but you will
notice that the sales process doesn’t begin
with a relationship. Salespeople must first earn the
right to engage. What’s the key to building
effective relationships? The answer is credibility.
Now the question becomes: What are you doing different
than your competitors to establish credibility in
your targeted prospect accounts? Everyone claims to
have the “best product,” which once again,
makes you average.
Leveraging curiosity to fuel the sales
process is another paradigm shift -- but it's one
that makes absolute sense. If a prospective customer
is not curious, then it becomes very difficult for
a salesperson to secure their time or their attention.
On the other hand, a curious prospect will want to
engage in a conversation about their needs and your
solutions to satisfy their curiosity. Now the question
is. . .What are you doing to leverage curiosity in
the sales process?
The message is clear. If you are going
to train your sales organization, then make sure to
invest in something that teaches them how to be different,
in order to give them back their competitive edge.
After all, just because you have a great story, doesn’t
necessarily mean prospects and customers will “want
to” hear it.
 |
 |
| Thomas
A. Freese, president of QBS Research, Inc.,
is recognized as one of the foremost authorities
on strategic sales methods and buyer motivation.
|
 |
 |
 |
|